Should The Federal Government Place A Cap On Child Support

Many people believe that should the Federal Government place a cap on child support, that support will remain the same throughout the child’s life. In addition, CP’s would argue that the Federal Government should not be involved in such matters, when in fact it has already placed its hand in the pot by seizing federal tax refunds or the denial of a new or re-finance mortgage until the current arrearages are paid in full. It has further been argued by many that child support payments do not cover enough of the current support of the child, let alone cover the extras a child may need now or in the future, therefore, no cap should be placed on child support obligations. As stated above, the CP has the right to ask for modification of a†¦show more content†¦What some of the CPs do not take into consideration is: (1) What happens if the other person loses their job and they are depending on that money for the sole purpose of a specific payment; (2) What happens when the support obligation ends (such as it being factored into a 30-year mortgage); and, (3) What happens when a child needs reoccurring expenses, such as new clothes or school supplies. The child support agencies do not take into consideration if the CP is receiving any type of assistance from a State agency, employment, or other resources in paying their portion of one-half of these expenses. Matter of fact, while the NCP is then requ ired to reimburse the State agency for the TANF, Medicaid expenses, in addition paying the above-mentioned fees, they are not entitled to get the relief of the earned income tax credit per the IRS statutes. In addition, while the NCP is paying child support, plus one-half of the above listed fees, they do not get the tax benefit of the child on their tax return. Currently it is suggested that the Earned Income Tax Credit is being used as a gift rather than a credit for the children for the remaining of the year. As noted by Kelly Phillips Erb (2016), Also on the list? Plastic surgery. More Americans than ever before will be using their tax returns to pay forShow MoreRelatedControl Over Having Children1817 Words   |  7 PagesBoth men and women should have control over when and if, they want to become parents. However, this is easier said than done. There are many ways to prevent or terminate a pregnancy, but are disputed with ethics, religion, and biology. There is a lot of controversy surrounding women’s opinion to be pro-life or pro-choice. One of the most famous examples of government involvement in the matter of women’s reproductive health is Roe v. Wade. In 1973, Ro e v. Wade ruled it was unconstitutional to banRead MoreEthical Issues That Surround the Welfare System2759 Words   |  12 PagesEthical Issues that Surround the Welfare System Daniel Pexton SOC 120 Instructor: Sherri Boyd May 11, 2012 Ethical Issues that Surround the Welfare System In the last 15 years the welfare system has gone from a government run system, to a state run function. This actually promotes a better welfare system that is in favor of all who are involved, including the tax payers whom ultimately fund it. Creating a program that helps prevent drug use while on welfare, and promoting families to findRead MoreEssay On Health Insurance1470 Words   |  6 PagesChildren’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) varies from state to state. [CHIP is a collaboration between federal and state governments. The programs are run by the individual states according to requirements set-up by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. States may organize CHIP programs as an independent program separate from Medicaid, such as separate child health programs, use CHIP funds to expand their Medicaid programs like SCHIP Medicaid expansion programs, or can combineRead MorePoverty Is The State Of Not For Poor, Single Parent Households And The Disabled11 53 Words   |  5 Pages(food, housing, and clothing) to survive. The government programs that are designed to alleviate poverty and help the poor are called â€Å"public welfare† or antipoverty programs. There is not just one public welfare program that exists, there are many. Each system is designed to benefit low-income groups and have their own targeted populace, characteristic, and/or need that it addresses. The most important programs are those that provide income support to poor, single-parent households and the disabledRead MoreThe Legacy Of The New Deal1426 Words   |  6 Pagesdesperately looked for a sign of hope. The ultimate end to the Great Depression was undoubtedly World War II. However, it was FDR’s New Deal that shed the light of hope on America’s citizens. The programs of the New Deal transformed the role of the government by the implication of numerous laws in order to stop the economy from getting any worse. The New Deal came with three n ew main themes: relief, recovery and reform. Roosevelt himself acknowledges the importance of them in his Address in 1934, â€Å"InRead More HOW CAN WE STOP THE ABUSE OF THE AMERICAN WELFARE SYSTEM? Essay2275 Words   |  10 Pagesof widows and disabled people into the social security system. In the 1960’s policymakers began to speak of creating equal opportunity for everyone by educating and rehabilitating the poor so they could compete (on an equal footing) in the market place. The policymakers thought that this would eliminate the artificial barriers imposed by the circumstances of birth. By the late 1960’s a â€Å"welfare rights† movement advanced the claim that welfare was not an act of public charity, but instead an entitlementRead MoreHousing Market and Property Taxes Effect Essay examples1698 Words   |  7 Pagesdown turn there was not a raise in taxes causing the states to increase spending cuts and to use more federal monies and their rainy day funds. Because of this lack of revenue coming from property tax and housing bubble it caused the local governments budgets to be impacted negatively. By examining how much the property tax actually impacts, versus the other taxes collected in the local government one can see how big of an influenc ed it plays in our education system and our public services. OneRead More Welfare Reform: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Legislation2809 Words   |  12 Pagescash assistance to eligible families. Instead the federal government gives block grants to assist poor families with the emphasis on moving them from welfare to work or deterring them from applying for welfare in the first place. States are no longer obligated to match federal funds, creating an incentive to eliminate their previous portion of the funding for critical programs. Now due to less funding and no standard rules or regulations in place, thousands of families never find out that they stillRead MoreBirth Control : A Controversial Topic Since The 1960 S1718 Words   |  7 Pagesbirth control. However, most women want to be able to choose when the time is right for them to have a child. This is why birth control is essential, because it allows women and couples in general the freedom to choose and plan their families. In many cases the need to control women by con trolling their access to birth control goes all the way to the federal government. The federal government determines what types of birth control are allowed on the market and who has access to them. Some PresidentialRead MoreThe Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act Of 20101713 Words   |  7 PagesRandi Penn Paper 1 Boyer AHM102 Online March 8, 2015 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is also referred to as ACA or Obamacare. ACA is a federal statute that was signed by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. President Obama worked to make this law a success in order to ensure that Americans receive proper healthcare. The goal of the ACA is to promote quality healthcare and to amplify the accessibility to lower income

Marketing Theory Case of The Coca Cola Company Free Essays

string(66) " description of Vitamin Water as ‘nutritious’ was misleading\." Introduction This report focuses on specific marketing theory, relevant to The Coca Cola Company, marketing theory include Marketing Orientation, Marketing Mix, Marketing environment and SWOT analysis. The author will make analysis of these theories, with an application to the attitudes and marketing decisions of The Soft-Drinks Manufacturer. Marketing Orientation This is when a company takes into account its customers’ needs when making decisions concerning their services they offer and items of sale. We will write a custom essay sample on Marketing Theory Case of The Coca Cola Company or any similar topic only for you Order Now There are many benefits of doing this, as the product will more likely meet the needs of their targeted audience, therefore consumers will be more willing to by the product, there is more of a guarantee the product will sale. However in previous decades, many businesses have opted for a product-orientation approach, this is when a company is more concerned with the production of the product, and the systems that are used in its production. (The Times 100, n.d) (The Times 100, n.d) states in the recent decades many companies had preferred to be more product-orientated than customer-orientated, because of the increase in competitiveness within the market, these companies that adopted this orientation were losing out, as a company within a competitive market can only should strive to develop products that suit their audience needs, in failing to do so, they will lose customers fast in the competitive market, this demonstrates the need for products to be more consumer focused especially if a company is operating in a competitive marketing environment, if a company prides itself on the quality of its services and products, through the usage of new expensive technologies for example, then it would be understandable as to why they would continue to be product orientated. (The Times 100, n.d) Some companies are adopting both orientations, taking into account both the expectations and needs of the customer as well as the quality of product for the item of sale. According to the source, many companies like Coca-Cola are moving towards market (customer) and product orientation, in doing this Coca-Cola conduct marketing research to find out their consumer interests and desires, in finding this they will make amends to the production of their product depending on what the results show the marketing managers. (The Times 100, n.d) The marketing environment Social-cultural environment This is the environment that focuses on the understanding of their target audience; the study of this environment will help Coca-Cola understand what motivate consumers to buy their soft-drinks. Coca-Cola is also influenced by society views, for instance because of the issues surrounding the among of sugars presented in Food and Drink, and the Food Standards Agency, the production of Coca-Cola drinks now contain less sugars, and any other ingredients that are deemed artificial and bad for Health. (Brassington, Petttitt, 2007) According to sources, the Food Standard Agency had in recent years opted for Drink companies to sell their fizzy drinks in smaller quantities, this was in response to the ongoing obesity crisis in the United Kingdom. ‘Drinks with added sugar such as cans of fizzy pop, should be sold in smaller 250ml cans alongside the standard 330ml, it was recommended.’ (Smith, 2010) a study of the social-cultural environment will also lead to an understanding of the demographics. (Brassington, Petttitt, 2007) Economic/competitive This is the environment that allows companies to identify both macroeconomic and microeconomic situations in the market, the influences are different, it can affect the sources of long-term and short-term finances available to Coca-Cola, the influences can also effect the consumer demand from their customers, for instance the credit crunch had decreased the among of expenditure available to consumers. (Brassington, Petttitt, 2007) during 2008 Coca-Cola had suffered from economic influences due to the crunch, in which it was estimated that their Bottled water products were experiencing less demand, in key markets such as the US and Europe. Because of the credit crunch bottled water had experienced a high sales growth in 2007, but ‘middle-classed wallets were squeezed down by the economic downturn’. (Anon, 2008) How Coca-Cola responded to the influences. Coca-Cola has what is described as a financial muscle, the business was at the time was predicted to not be effected by the ‘economic storm’ as their international competitors, this was arguably because of their successful approach towards brand positioning, which has allowed them to still obtain promotional support, without being disrupted by the economic downturn. (Anon, 2008)Other influences that can be either positive or negative include government policy, taxation, and interest rates. (Brassington, Petttitt, 2007) Technological environment/innovation affecting Coca-Cola and many businesses in general, have had new marketing opportunities, because of the advances of technology, such influences are mostly positive, as the production and manufacturing costs of their drinks are mostly likely to have decreased. (Brassington, Pettitt, 2007) In regard to product of products, technology has also helped increase the product quality, which is important to a company such as Coca-Cola who may focus on product-orientation. For instance, the soft drink’s company experienced new technological advances which allowed them to preserve the fuzziness’ and ice-coldness each of their bottled drinks on sale, ‘By packing new technology into each bottle, so when the cap is twisted off, a mechanism inside will create ice made from the drink itself’. (Hannaford, 2007) Technology has also helped the advancement of more opportunities for promoting the Coca-Cola brand; the company has opened an online website and has been able to advertise on internet websites which would help increase brand awareness. (Brassington, Petttitt, 2007) Political regulatory influences These influences relate to the outside governmental regulatory bodies that have jurisdiction under our national and European parliament to impose restrictions and rules relating to trade and other business operations, such influences include the Advertising Standards Agency, for instance Coca-Cola had to an advertisement banned for ‘claiming it to be nutritious while it contained up to five teaspoons of sugar.’ (Sinclair, 2011)†Because Vitamin Water contained about a quarter of a consumer’s GDA (guideline daily amount) for sugar as well as the added vitamins, we considered that the description of Vitamin Water as ‘nutritious’ was misleading. You read "Marketing Theory Case of The Coca Cola Company" in category "Essay examples"† (Sinclair, 2011) this demonstrates the impact, as the company had to recall their advertising campaign. To conclude most of these regulations that have jurisdiction over Coca-Colas operates are enforced by law to ac t as regulators, other regulatory bodies include, trade associations, the EU and the local and national parliament. (Brassington, Petttitt, 2007) Marketing Mix The marketing mix strategy is a marketing tool used by many businesses, it helps managers develop their product to suit their customer needs, the tool helps the business set pricing strategies and promotional strategies which are variable, meaning that the company can make changes to their mix to match the external influences such as the economic downturn, the marketing mix is controllable itself, it allows Coca-Cola to adapt more efficiently to environmental influences of the market. (Palmer, 2009, 2004) Why is it needed? The marketing mix is needed to match the mix elements to the consumer needs; they are the ‘ingredients to achieve the desired outcome of the consumers.’ (Palmer, 2009, 2004) Each of the elements relate to one another, for instance pricing (considered the most important mix element), would largely concern the product it self, the quality of the product determines the pricing, if it is a product of high quality then the company may adopt a premium pricing strategy for example, this would also determine the promotion mix element, audiences are different, the premium pricing strategy may influence the business to target wealthy customers, who value high quality premium products or services. As well as pros, which highlight the positive things a marketing mix strategy can do for The Coca Cola Company, there are also negative aspects of it, issues which put the customer first, such as with the developments of quality services can become lost, to combat this disadvantage it is suggested that there should be an ‘adoption of a more holistic approach by marketing managers to respond to their customer needs’(Palmer, 2009), it would be recommended that managers focus on a product-led approach to marketing. (Palmer, 2009) Product For Coca-cola, their main product on offer is soft drinks. With regard to the production of the soft drink itself, the main element to their products on offer is Coca-Cola. The Coca-Cola company is an international global business, and has more than just one product within the soft-drinks market, other products include Fanta and Sprite all owned by the Coca-Cola Company. (n.d, Sharma, Kumar) Their Products on offer help the company, to motivate the consumer in purchasing the drink. It can be intangible (a service) or tangible, in this case Coca-Cola are providing tangible products. This mix will allow the Soft drinks company to moderate the quality, packaging, quantity of size, all to satisfy their consumers. The moderation is important, it allows Coca-Cola to design for instance their Packaging for different seasons, such as the Christmas season in which they make changing to the style in order to get people into the Christmas spirit, this encourage sells, it demonstrates the changes in the mix allows the company to keep up with marketing opportunities in the marketing environment, it also helps develop their brand image. (Palmer, 2009) Place (Distribution) This mix, allows The Coca Cola Company to make sure their products are available in convenient places, wherever the consumer prefers to purchase the items, it allows the company to make new distributions, if their marketing research suggest their target audience prefer to purchase their items in new places. (Palmer, 2009) This mix allows Coca Cola to amend their distributional strategies in place, depending their target audience preference. A good distributional strategy is crucial as an ineffective strategy will impact negatively on the companies’ turnover figures. In marketing distributional decisions, markets must focus on whether the costs of such distribution is affordable and how close the customers are to receiving the product. Marketing managers have an option to adopt strategies such as direct and selective distribution, Coca-Cola products are available in large supermarkets and vending machines, this indicates an intensive distribution, as it is available anywhere a t any time (24hr petrol shops) anyplace. Recommendation for efficient distributional channel Coca Cola distributes their products to a wide variety of retailers; therefore this would indicate a need for an efficient management of distribution. (Brassington, Petttitt, 2007) The company as a manufacturer would need to deal with stock controlling, transporting their soft drinks products, and finding warehouse facilities for their products. Pricing This is the most important mix of all, it is important as adopting the wrong pricing strategy would lead to a loss of profits, however a good pricing strategy, which is affordable to target customers would lead to higher turnover for The Coca Cola Company. The Pricing mix varies from other Ps, as the other mainly evolves around company expenditure decisions. The Coca-Cola Companies’ Competitive Pricing Strategy According to sources, the Coca-Cola Company currently adopts a competitive pricing strategy. (Sharma, Kumar, n.d,) this is when companies set their prices according to the current market price, The marketing had become more competitive with operating companies such as Pepsi entering the market; this forced the company to adopt a competitive pricing strategy in order to stay the cheapest in the market. In this current period, along with their competitive strategy the firm has also had to make les expenditure on their manufacturing process, and more expenditure on their advertising to keep consumer interest from rivals. (Sharma, Kumar, n.d,) Cost-Based Pricing strategy Originally they were operating within a niche market, before other competitors such a Pepsi had emerged, because of the new market for Soft drinks, the company did not have to adopt a competitive pricing strategy, instead adopting a cost-based pricing strategy, in which ‘a fixed sum or a percentage of the total cost is added (as income or profit) to the cost of the product to arrive at its selling price’. (Business Dictionary, n.d) Recommendation on Good Pricing Strategies ‘If the selling price of a product is set too high, a company may mot achieve its sales volume targets. If it is set too low, volume targets may be by achieved, but no profit earned.’ (Palmer, 2009) In order to adopt good pricing strategies, there will need to be some evidence such from marketing research as to what consumers will expect to pay. Many companies face hard pricing decisions, as pricing cannot be determined alone with the consideration of target audiences, it would be recommended that firms consider the marketing environment, as consumers’ needs changes depending on the current external environment, and the ‘interaction of market forces’. (Palmer, 2009) the pricing strategy is also variable, the company can make on-going changes to their pricing strategy, however such a minor difference can cause a significant change to revenue, e.g. Lower or higher profits. (Brassington, Petttitt, 2007) Promotion This mix is used to help with the communication of the companies brand to the customers, through sale promotional strategies, sponsorship and through (PR) Public Relations. This mix helps Coca-Cola decide on their advertising expenditure. (Palmer, 2009) Promotional Decisions The promotional strategies along with product and distributional strategy all need to be considered together in order for the company to make better decisions in their mix, it all lies down to evidence, which should give good estimations on their customers likely spending habits and where to target these customers. Coca-Cola through promotional campaigns want to demonstrate how good their brand is, this can be done through various strategies, such as personal selling (Coca-Cola Stalls at public events) , sales discounts (in shopping centres) Research has shown that, Coca-Cola tends to spend large sums on advertising, for instance in 1987 the company made an expenditure of around ?140 million, in television, radio and Printing publications. (Boy, JR, Walker, JR, 1990) This kind of mass media advertising is essential, as most of their customers are likely targeted this way, it helps keep up their brand image, and in attracting new potential customers. Free tasters are also a good strategy as the company brings out new versions of its drinks; this will lead to a new consumer base, and will help generate more loyalty. SWOT Analysis This is the study of strengths, weaknesses and threats (SWOT) This is analysis is needed so that Managers can understand the main threats and opportunities, it helps to get an overall view as to whether the business is profitable or not. It helps with the anticipation of future developments for the company. The SWOT doesn’t include assets of the business; it highlights opportunities for success and potential failure (Kotler, Wong, Saunders, Armstrong, 2005) Strengths The Coca-cola has been operating within the market for decades, it was once a niche market for the company, this indicates power-over competitors in relation to its brand image, it has been in the ‘game’ for years, and therefore, there is a high public awareness of their products. ‘Coke is the world’s largest non-alcoholic beverage company. Coke sells more than 500 brands of beverages. The company operates five geographic segments: Eurasia Africa, Europe, Latin America, North America, and Pacific.’ (Seeking Alpha, 2011) The company is still experiencing a higher profit margin, for these reasons the company has ambitions to ‘double revenue by 2020. They believe that volume will be by the fast-growing markets and improvement in North America.’ (Seeking Alpha, 2011) Weaknesses: In order for a business to survive weaknesses need to be identified and then appropriate cautions will need to be put in place so that, any weaknesses are reduced significantly so that they no longer pose a disadvantage to the company. (Kotler, Wong, Saunders, Armstrong, 2005) The Coca-Cola Company has been able to remain profitable in their many years of operating as a company. As identified before, the Advertising Standards Agency and Food Standards Agency had imposed restrictions on their advertising campaign because of the among of sugar used in their products, this demonstrates a disadvantage for the company, these restrictions could lead to lesser profits, their soft-drinks generally aren’t good for their consumers. For these reasons the company may experience negative publicity which would be a disadvantage. Opportunities: New markets: The Coca Cola had begun operating in the bottled water market, because of the growth, in which the UK market for bottled water alone has an estimation of near to ?1.4 billion. (British Bottled Water, 2009) this is an opportunity because it opens the company to new audiences increasing their brand image. Threats: There are many threats that are imposed upon organisations, such as the ability of Pepsi, (Coca-Cola’s closet rival), to take over the Soft-Drinks industry. The fact that Coca-Cola has to adopt a competitive pricing strategy shows that there is major competition within the market. Other substituting non-alcoholic beverages also pose a threat to the company; such products sold by Starbucks can threaten the profitability of the soft-drinks company. With the ongoing regulations imposed by the Food Standards Agency and (ASA) consumer may put their health first and choose healthier soft-drink alternatives, which would cause a lowering of turnover for the company. The fact that there are competitive pricing strategies between the likes of their rivals Pepsi also imposes the likeliness of customers ignoring both companies and choosing even cheaper alternatives such as Sainsbury’s and Asda branded Cola.(Kotler, Wong, Saunders, Armstrong, 2005) Brand management Coca-Cola company main asset is their brand image, it is important in retaining their customers. Brand management involves the enhancing of ones brand, keeping customer interest and expanding to new audiences. To do this requires a lot of attention to the customers, getting them to remember the ‘name, term, sign, symbol design or a combination of these that identifies the maker or seller of the product or service.’ (Kotler, Wong, Saunders, Armstrong, 2005) Brand management is needed, as it increases a company’s ability to get a consumer to add and worship its name and value its quality of product, fending off other competitors by teaching the customer, that their brand is better. There is also an advantage for suppliers, it allows them to Coca Cola understands the importance of its brand image, through the overly use of promotional campaigns and various attempts at direct, and personal selling. It has been said the firm prefer to spend more on its promotional campaigns than its manufacturing costs. The firm has generated a brand image through its logo, which evidently always uses the colour red, in doing this they are reminding customers of their existence whilist increasing their awareness. Branding strategies The Coca-Cola Company has introduced major soft-drink of different kinds into the market, each kind has a different image, and this demonstrates an individual branding strategy, through the usage of new brand names for the various new products they have introduced over the years. There are many advantages in doing this, it increases their audience and allows the company to work on new brands, however these new products such as Fanta do not include the original branding, and therefore it could lead to their loyal customers forgetting the Coca-Cola image. Conclusion To conclude, The Coca Cola company has implemented good strategies, the managers of the company clearly understand the importance of meeting its customer needs, and enhancing its brand image to retain and remind customers of its good brand, hence the need for such a large expenditure on promotional campaigns, it utilizes the marketing mix well, through the adoption of competitor pricing strategy, it realizes its success can be easily threatened by competitors such as Pepsi, and substitute non-alcoholic beverages such as Coffee and tea. Through its current attitudes and good usage of the marketing mix variables, it is certain this business will continue to dominate and likely double their revenue as they have plan to do so by 2020, however external influences such as social cultural and economic influences could lead to a failure, regulatory bodies imposing restrictions could stop the business from reaching its potential if it continues on producing ‘misleading’ adverti sements, however the worldwide recognition of its branding and along with individual brand images, this demonstrates the business has the potential to reach their goal. Reference and Bibliography Books: Palmer, A (2009) Introduction to Marketing. Oxford University Press Brassington, F Pettitt, S Essentials of Marketing, FT Prentice Hall 2nd edititon Doyle, P. Marketing Management and Strategy, Prentice Hall Kotler, P. (2006) Marketing Management Prentice Hall 12th Edition Boyd, W. H, Walker, C. (1990) Marketing Management: A strategic Approach International Student Edition IRWIN publishing Kotler, P, Wong, V, Saunders, J, Armstrong, G (2005) Principles of Marketing 4th European Edition Published by Pearson prentice Hall Internet Sources: The Times 100 ‘Market and Product Orientation’ http://www.thetimes100.co.uk/theory/theory–market-product-orientation–211.php [Accessed March 25th 2011] Smith, R (2010) ‘Sell fizzy pop in smaller cans: Food Standards Agency’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/7527712/Sell-fizzy-pop-in-smaller-cans-Food-Standards-Agency.html {Accessed March 25th 2011] anon, 2008 Focus – Leading water brands hit by credit crunch http://www.just-drinks.com/analysis/focus-leading-water-brands-hit-by-credit-crunch_id95738.aspx {Accessed March 25th 2011] Sinclair, L (2011) ‘Coca-Cola in Hot Water Over Nutritious Ad’{Accessed March 25th 2011] Hannaford, K (2007) ‘New Technology by Coca-Cola allows ice-cubes to form in bottles of Sprite: TEC’ http://www.techdigest.tv/2007/09/new_technology_1.html {Accessed March 25th 2011] Sharma, S Kumar, S (n.d) 4ps Analysis of Nestle and Cadbury Dairy Milk Pvt. Ltd. Delhi Business School {Accessed March 25th 2011] http://www.scribd.com/doc/31376062/MARKET-SEGMENTATION-AN [Accessed 1st April 2011] Anon, n.d â€Å"Coca-Cola Case Study.† 123HelpMe.com. [Accessed 1st Apr 2011] . Seeking Alpha (2011) ‘Just One Stock: Returns, Cash Flow, Emerging-Market Potential for Coke’s World-Class Beverage Brand†http://seekingalpha.com/article/263186-just-one-stock-returns-cash-flow-emerging-market-potential-for-coke-s-world-class-beverage-brand [Accessed 1st Apr 2011] British Bottled Water (2009) http://www.britishbottledwater.org/vitalstats.html [Accessed 1st Apr 2011] http://www.scribd.com/doc/16945054/marketing-plan-of-coca-cola [Accessed 1st Apr 2011] http://www.scribd.com/doc/9995196/Swot-Analysis-of-Coca-Cola [Accessed 1st April 2011] How to cite Marketing Theory Case of The Coca Cola Company, Essay examples

Contemporary Accounting Theory for Pengurusan -myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theContemporary Accounting Theory for Pengurusan. Answer: Introduction The presence of a strong regulatory environment in the financial reporting is essential to ensure that needs of the users of the financial statements are adequately met. The regulatory framework overviews and monitors the procedures used by business entities for developing their general purpose financial reports. It is required to be implemented by the business entities for ensuring that the information given in the relevant economic area is reliable and have consistency with the requirement of the financial reporting standards (Boelens, 2004). There are large numbers of companies that are established in home country as well as in other countries, which make highly important for these companies to adhere with all the regulatory requirement of financial accounting and prepare their financial statements that can be accepted at international level with any major discrepancies. Regulatory framework also increases the confidence in the financial reporting process and also regulates the be havior of companies towards their investors. The regulation capture theory states that regulations are manipulated in order to fit the requirement of those who are impacted by those regulations (Evans, 2012). The report, in this regard, provides a discussion of the regulatory framework in developed countries like Australia and Singapore. Report also includes discussion on the regulatory capture theory and characteristics that show that regulatory environment might have been captured. Literature review of regulatory environment for financial reporting in Australia and Singapore The major issues or problems find in each of countrys regulatory framework of financial reporting As reported by the Financial Reporting Council established under the Australian Government there are many fundamental issues in the regularity environment of financial reporting. It has been found that there are range of different thresholds in different entity types that have inconsistent reporting and audit requirements. The differences in these thresholds and reporting requirements is not due to the different risk characteristics or any other factors that best describes the reasons of this issue. There are many differences for the audit requirement under different class of entities (Wirth Mattessich, 2006). There are some entities that requires audit to be performed by the registered company auditors while there are some companies that requires audit to be performed by only the member of Chartered accountants ANZ, CPA or IPA (Nobes, 2011). The regulatory framework of financial reporting developed by the respective bodies in Australia has many persuade problems that make it diffic ult for the different entities to choose which reporting standard is applicable on them or which standards are not applicable on them (Zeff, 1993).There is major issue related with the reporting requirements for different type of entities. Entities that are listed, not listed, government companies and other entities that defined as the reporting entities are required to lodge the financial reports on the public records (Wirth and Mattessich, 2006). All the reporting entities provide general purpose financial report with application of all the standards while there are some reporting entities that applies only the full recognition and measurement requirements with minimum disclosure. Entities that are not reporting entities have been provided relief from providing general purpose financial statements with full disclosure and they can submit special purpose financial reports (Haswell, S McKinnon, 2003). The Singapore Financial Reporting Standards (SFRS) framework was first introduced in year 2012 by the Accounting Standard Council (ASC). The MFRS is fully compatible with the international financial reporting standard (IFRS) but there are certain issues that provide relief to certain category of entities. There is no certain reporting standards developed by the ASC but there are separate standards for each category of entities. There has been major issue that gives rise to conflict with the treatment of the Islamic Banking and Finance in relation to measurement, recognition and disclosures (Saudagaran, S. Diga, 2002). The main problem is that Islamic banking regulations are based on Syariah that does have compatibility with the SFRS framework. As reported by the Hanefah and Singh (2012), there are no major issues found in the Singapore reporting framework. Author has claimed that Singapore is on the right track with no consistent issues with the regulatory framework and over the tim e Singapore Accounting Body will built more strong financial reporting framework (International Monetary Fund, 2004). Working of Regulatory Environment in each of the selected Countries Both the selected countries have their own regulatory body that governs the practices of financial reporting in their respective countries. In Australia, Australian Accounting Standard Board (AASB) governs the regulatory environment of financial reporting and provides the standards that meet the compatibility with IFRS accounting standards. While in Singapore there is Accounting Standard Council that develops and governs the accounting reporting requirements. AASB has provided fully compatible accounting regulatory framework and accounting standards that fully compatible with the requirement of the IFRS but there are some inconsistency in regards to favor provided to some special class of entities in relation disclosing requirements and preparation of financial statements (Tanaka, 2007). So it is important that AASB must review their accounting framework legislation and make the required changes so that all these inconsistency can be removed. In Singapore there is no combined account ing framework for all the entities but they have separate legislation for different class of entities. It is suggested that all the legislation must be combined to form the proper framework that is fully compatible with the IFRS (Financial Reporting Council, 2014). Progress of both countries in adoption IFRS framework As reported by the AASB, Australia has adopted the IFRS from 1 January, 2005 and it was decided by the FRC Board in year 2002. The AASB framework of financial reporting has made the required changes in order to comply with the IFRS but there is some inconsistency with the IFRS that requires review and certain changes in upcoming years. In Singapore there is no proper accounting framework and it is developing phase to adopt the IFRS in the existing accounting regulatory framework (Cortese, Corinne Irvine, Helen, 2010). Regulatory Capture Theory and Characteristics Indicating that Regulatory Environment is Captured The theory of regulatory capture was given by George Stigler, an economist, to describe the impact of the regulatory bodies on the industries that they are regulating. The theory has stated that regulatory capture occurs when a regulatory agency that was established to promote public interest act to provide benefit to the industry that it is regulatory in contrast to maximize public interest. The public interest agencies that are controlled by the industry for which they were established to regulate are known as captured agencies. The theory has regarded the regulatory agencies to be dominated by the producers that acts in accordance to their needs and requirements (Gaffikin, 2005). Thus, they are utility maximizes, that is, they aims to maximize their profit by marinating their political power. Thus, they seek to act in a direction that promotes the welfare of the groups who are positively impacted by their regulatory decisions. As such, regulatory agencies are captured by the inter ests of the specific groups that are regulated by them and as such they aim to maximize their wealth (Evans, 2012). The characteristics indicating that a regulatory environment is captured are subsidies realized by specific industry groups, restricting the entry of the new firms, suppressing the substitute and competitive products, encouragement of complementary products and fixation of price (Godfrey Smith, 2005). The theory of regulatory capture can be effectively understood in the context of the public choice theory asp per which the actions of the government bodies are influenced by maximizing their own welfare. Thus, the regulatory goals established by the captured agencies are developed to maximize their own wealth or income and thus they serve private interests in comparison to the public interests. As such, the theory can be used for examining the behavior of the regulatory agencies in different environment and thus predicting whether it is being captured or not (Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, 2014). Analysis of Australia and Singapore environment using Capture Theory The Australian Financial Reporting Council decision to comply with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is to improve consistency of Australian accounting standards in the year 2005. The decisions has largely shocked the business community as the council has declared to comply with IFRS standards at a time when Australia has developed most efficient financial reporting system. Thus, it has been cited that the change proposed by ASIC is under the political initiatives for serving the interests of the various political bodies and therefore the Australian regulatory bodies are regarded as being captured (Jones Higgins, 2006). The political bodies include the different agencies that are benefitted from the proposed changes in the Australian financial reporting framework. The AASB mainly aims to comply with the IFRS as per the European Union (EU) goals adopting international accounting standards. As such, Australia is aiming to secure its competitive position in the int ernational market by adopting IFRS (Sacer, 2011). The adoption of such a change seeks to provide maximum benefit to the foreign investors as they can easily compare the performance of the companies on the basis of IFRS standards. As such, it would helps in seeking foreign investment and promoting the growth of the Australian business companies. In addition to this, the industrial sector in Australia would realize the cost benefit involved in reconciling of financial statements between various reporting regimes (Zarb, Pagiavlas, 2003). Therefore, it can be said that Australian financial reporting environment is being captured by the regulatory bodies that aims to secure the competitiveness of the Australian business companies. However, the regulatory bodies are not placing emphasis on the negative implication such as loss of competitive advantage of Australia due to its efficient financial reporting framework (Lonergan, 2003). On the other hand, the financial reporting framework in Singapore is regarded to be less captured as it is mainly aiming to serve public interest rather than private interest of the associated party groups. The Accounting Standards Council (ASC) is largely held responsible for developing accounting standards in the country. It is developed as per the public interest in accordance with the Singapore corporate governance and financial reporting framework. The ASC has adopted Singapore Financial Reporting Standards, the financial Reporting Standards (FRS) and a spate set of financial reporting standards for small business entities of SRRS (Embong Rad, 2013). In addition to this, ASC has also developed accounting standards for charities, co-operative societies. Thus, ASC is acting in the interest of promoting public welfare rather than seeking to cause benefit to Singapore business companies for maximizing its own personal motive of wealth or income. Therefore, it can be said that Singa pore financial regulatory environment is less captured in comparison to the Australian financial reporting environment (Martnez-Ferrero, 2014). Conclusion Thus, it can be stated form the overall discussion held in the report that there are wide differences between the financial reporting system of Australia and Singapore. The Australian Reporting Council is emphasizing on complete compliance with IFRS standards for promoting the global competitiveness of Australia. This is largely directed by the political influence of the EU and thus AASB is seeking to gain benefits of IFRS through its compliance in the Australian financial reporting system. Therefore, there is a presence of regulatory capture in the Australian financial reporting environment because the regulatory bodies in Australia are seeking for their own benefits through promoting the growth of the Australian business companies. They are not emphasizing on ensuring the presence of accountability and reliability within the financial reporting framework and only on boosting the growth of the Australian companies on an international level. This is not a good sign for Australian rep orting environment as it will tend to weaken the financial reporting framework within the country in the long-term. On the other hand, the financial reporting framework within Singapore is more transparent and accountable as compared to that in Australia. The Accounting Standards Council (ASC) in Australia has developed Singapore Financial reporting Standards as per IFRS but is not emphasizing on its adoption for realizing benefits through improving the competitiveness of Singapore companies at international level. There is also separate set of standards for small entities as per their regulatory environment and therefore there is presence of more reliability and transparency within the business operations of Singapore companies. As such, it can be stated that financial reporting environment in Singapore is less regulatory captured as the regulatory bodies are emphasizing to promote public rather than private welfare. References Boelens, S. (2004). Quality of Financial Reporting: measuring qualitative characteristics. Institute for Management Research. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. (2014). Retrieved 9 April, 2018, from https://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/ACCED264_06-15.pdf Cortese, Corinne Irvine, Helen J. (2010) Investigating international accounting standard setting : the black box of IFRS 6. Research in Accounting Regulation 22(2). pp. 87-95. Embong, Z. Rad, E. (2013). International Financial Reporting Standards and Financial Information Quality: Principles versus Rules-based Standards. Jurnal Pengurusan 39, pp.93 109. Evans, M. (2012). The Financial Reporting Environment, Reporting Discretion, and Earnings Management: US GAAP vs. IFRS. Kelley School of Business. Financial Reporting Council. (2014). Retrieved 9 April, 2018, from https://www.frc.gov.au/documents/publication/financial-reporting-taskforce-2015/ Gaffikin, M. (2005). Regulation as Accounting Theory. Accounting Finance. Godfrey, J. Smith, I. (2005.) Regulatory Capture in the Globalization of Accounting Standards.Environment and Planning. Haswell, S McKinnon, J. (2003). IASB standards for Australia by 2005: capitulation or Trojan horse?Australian Accounting Review13(1), pp.816. International Monetary Fund. (2004). Singapore: Financial System Stability Assessment, including Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes. Retrieved 9 April, 2018, from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2004/cr04104.pdf Jones, S. Higgins, A.D. (2006). Australias switch to international financial reporting standards: a perspective from account preparers. Accounting and Finance 46, pp. 629652. Lonergan, W. (2003). The emasculation of accounting standard setting in Australia. Jassa, pp. 6-12. Martnez-Ferrero, J. (2014). Consequences of financial reporting quality on corporate performance. Evidence at the international level. Economia 41(1), pp. 49-88. Nobes, C. (2011). IFRS Practices and the Persistence of Accounting System Classification. Abacus 47 (3), pp. 267-283. Sacer, M. (2011). The regulatory framework of accounting and accounting standard-setting bodies in the European Union member states. Economics and Business 39(4), pp. 394-409. Saudagaran, S. Diga, J. (2002). The Institutional Environment of Financial Reporting Regulation in ASEAN. The International Journal of Accounting 35(1,) pp. 1-26. Tanaka, G. 2(007). The Influence of the Cultural, Legal, Economic and Financial, Historical and Political Factors on the Accounting System: Peruvian Case. Accounting 7, pp. 25-45. Wirth and Mattessich. (2006). Accounting books of Argentina: publications, research and institutional background. Spanish Journal of Accounting History, 4, pp.137-154. Zarb, B. and Pagiavlas, N. (2003). Adoption of international accounting standards : antecedents, processes and outcomes. Journal of Academyof Business and Economics 1(2), pp. 1-11. Zeff, S, A. 1(993). International accounting principles and auditing standards. European Accounting Review 2, pp. 403410.